The Road to More GW

How SpaceX plans to get from 1.7 GW to 13 GW of nameplate compute by the end of 2027, what stands in the way and how likely it is.

Targets and outside views

What SpaceX has said it will reach, next to what analysts expected before the Q3 call. Compare the dots with the rings, but note the analyst views are older.

    The short answer

    Musk has not published a source-by-source power breakdown. He called the plan “highly proprietary” and declined to detail it. Pieced together from filings and analysts, it is mostly on-site natural gas, deliberately overbuilt. The weak links are turbine supply and build pace. Our estimate is a median of about 7 GW at the end of 2027, with roughly an 18% chance of 10 GW or more and about 7% for 13 GW or more.

    What the plan is

    The target. SpaceX had about 1.7 GW of nameplate compute at the end of September, expects 2.5–3 GW by year-end, and says it will add roughly 10 GW in 2027. That is separate from the power-and-cooling goal. SpaceX is aiming for 20 GW of power and cooling in 2027 so capacity runs far in excess of what’s needed to turn the GPUs on. On the Q2 call Musk said he expected closer to 15 GW if about a quarter of projects slip. We read this as roughly 1.5× overbuild. It also doubles as redundancy for islanded gas, which has no grid backup.

    Where the power comes from

    Reality check

    What 13 GW needs, against what has been shown so far
    Constraint2027 needsEvidence so farRead
    Build pace~830 MW/month, ~2.5 GW/quarterSouthaven added ~140 MW/month. The best quarter guided is +0.8–1.3 GW (Q4’26)2–3× the best quarter, sustained for four; ~6× the power-add rate
    Turbines~12–17 GW installed if islanded (our estimate)GE Vernova builds ~20 GW/yr worldwide and is selling 2031 slots; Mitsubishi deliveries now run to 2031The binding constraint. The big three can’t help, so it falls to mobile, aero and Doosan units
    Fuel~2–2.5 Bcf/day (our estimate)Memphis/Southaven onlyNeeds several dedicated pipeline laterals
    Chips220K GB300/month is ~5.3 GW/yr at about 2 kW per GPU (see Power and cooling on the Sites tab). 10 GW needs ~330–350K Rubin GPUs/monthNvidia exclusivity covers at least 10 GW of supplySecond constraint; Rubin ramp timing is the risk
    Money$350B (UBS) to $500B (SemiAnalysis at $50B/GW)Q4 capex is guided at $35–40B. $40B of chip financing is still in talksNeeds ~$90–125B/quarter, 2–3× the Q4 guide
    Sites~23 Minihard-size buildings (0.44 GW each)Nothing confirmed outside Memphis/Southaven. Texas sites were still being scouted in JulyThe gate

    Probabilities

    End-2027 nameplate compute, as SpaceX would report it

    Our estimate, not company guidance. The ranges add to 100%.

    The street was at 4–6 GW before Q3: Morgan Stanley modeled 4.9 GW, and buy-side expectations were roughly 4–6 GW. We moved up from our early-October estimate of 12% for 10 GW or more. Q4 capex guidance landed well above UBS’s $19B expectation. We held back for the 2031 turbine slots and the lack of any confirmed new site. “Nameplate” is also a loose measure, so the reported figure will likely flatter productive compute.

    These probabilities are judgment calls, not a forecast from SpaceX and not investment advice.

    What would move it